"Clinton’s campaign felt that Sanders had wounded her campaign by portraying her as “conspiring with Wall Street types to rig the system against the little guy.” Meanwhile, Clinton set out to raise extraordinary amounts of money from the financial aristocracy to fund a general election campaign based largely on television advertising."
The Washington Post’s Sargent notes, “One finding from the polling stands out: A shockingly large percentage of these Obama-Trump voters said Democrats’ economic policies will favor the wealthy—twice the percentage that said the same about Trump.
Her campaign married the military-intelligence apparatus and finance capital to the politics of racial and gender identity, while Clinton consciously ignored the economic struggles of the working class and opposed the demagogue Trump from the right on questions of war and state surveillance.
The American oligarchy, steeped in criminality and parasitism, can produce only a government of war, social reaction and repression. In its blind avarice, it is creating the conditions for unprecedented social upheavals. It is hurtling toward its own revolutionary demise at the hands of the working class.
“But what the Clintons do is criminal because they do it wholly at the expense of the American people. And they feel thoroughly entitled to do it: gain power, use it to enrich themselves and their friends. They are amoral, immoral, and venal. Hillary has no core beliefs beyond power and money. That should be clear to every person on the planet by now.”
The Democratic Convention, anti-Russian hysteria, and Clinton’s
concession
Clinton, the candidate favored by most of Wall Street and the corporate elite and large sections of the Republican Party establishment, is seeking to assemble something akin, within the framework of the US political setup, to a grand coalition between the Democratic Party and the Republican leadership.
Her campaign married the military-intelligence apparatus and finance capital to the politics of racial and gender identity, while Clinton consciously ignored the economic struggles of the working class and opposed the demagogue Trump from the right on questions of war and state surveillance.
The American oligarchy, steeped in criminality and parasitism, can produce only a government of war, social reaction and repression. In its blind avarice, it is creating the conditions for unprecedented social upheavals. It is hurtling toward its own revolutionary demise at the hands of the working class.
“But what the Clintons do is criminal because they do it wholly at the expense of the American people. And they feel thoroughly entitled to do it: gain power, use it to enrich themselves and their friends. They are amoral, immoral, and venal. Hillary has no core beliefs beyond power and money. That should be clear to every person on the planet by now.”
“So when Clinton was hobnobbing with Goldman Sachs CEO Blankfein in 2013, while investigations of wrongdoing by Goldman and the other Wall Street banks were still ongoing, she was consorting with a man who belonged in prison.”
Part Two
By Eric London
27 May 2017
27 May 2017
Part One of
this review of Shattered followed
the Democratic Party primary elections from 2015 through mid-2016. Part Two
traces the Clinton and Sanders campaigns from the Democratic National
Convention to the November election.
Sanders and Clinton at the Convention
Shattered provides details of the
collaboration between the Clinton and Sanders campaigns and the Obama White
House, which expose the Vermont senator’s political cowardice and the thuggery
and corruption of the Democratic Party leadership. Sanders’s performance at the
convention confirms his role in preventing masses of workers and youth with a
growing interest in socialism from breaking with the Democratic Party.
Obama personally met with Sanders after his defeat in the
California primary and urged him to end his campaign and support Clinton.
Sanders “irritated” Obama, according to the authors, and the president “could
be heard grumbling about” comparisons between his own 2008 campaign and
Sanders’s 2016 run. Obama “seldom failed to let his annoyance show.”
During their meeting, Obama said “he didn’t want Democrats
to lose what Bernie had brought to the table—and not just because he wanted
Hillary to win. Obama and Sanders shared a capacity to bring more people into
the political system. The two men spent some of their hour-long meeting
brainstorming ways that the Democratic Party could sustain the energy of
Bernie’s campaign both in the election and in helping to move public policy
debates with grassroots engagement.”
The Democratic Party used Sanders to “bring more people into
the political system”—i.e., to turn them into the Democratic Party and away
from socialism. During the convention, Sanders’s main goal was suppressing
opposition among his own delegation to Clinton’s nomination.
“Bernie and his top aides softened,” Allen and Parnes write,
but “his supporters didn’t always follow suit. ‘They were trying to get their
people in line,’ one Hillary source said.”
During discussion on the party platform, “Many of
[Sanders’s] supporters were furious with each loss in the development of the
program. … In the end, the platform threw enough vague concessions to Bernie
that he could support it without locking Hillary into detailed promises on
policy.”
Both campaigns were deeply concerned over the prospect of an
explosion of opposition on the floor of the convention hall. The following
passages are worth quoting in full:
There was good reason for them to fear a full-scale revolt
from Bernie’s delegates. The platform talks had demonstrated goodwill on the
part of Bernie and his top aides, but they’d also shown just how recalcitrant
many of his supporters remained. Both sides knew that Bernie didn’t really
control them, and that meant they could sow chaos inside the hall and on
television screens across the country. Heading into Monday, July 25, the first
day of the convention, [Clinton campaign manager Robert] Mook was nervous.
‘Absolutely shitting my pants’ is how he described it to others.
With his own speech scheduled for that night, Sanders sent a
text message to his
delegates imploring them to behave themselves on the floor.
‘I ask you as a personal courtesy to me not to engage in any kind of protest on
the floor,’ he wrote. By this point, he had a lot of skin in the game. If he
was seen as failing to unify a party that he had helped divide during the
primary, his reputation would be permanently damaged. That didn’t matter to his
diehards.
When Bernie delivered a speech to his delegates in a
ballroom at the nearby Philadelphia Convention Center, they booed lustily when
he spoke of his rival. Mook lost his temper. He picked up his phone and dialed
[Sanders senior aide Jeff] Weaver. ‘What the fuck are you doing?’ Mook
demanded. But Weaver wasn’t doing anything.
The two campaign managers’ worst fears were being realized.
There was a segment of Bernie’s constituency that was so angry they couldn’t
even stand silently by when he talked about his support for Hillary—and the
television news cameras had a knack for giving every last dead-ender his or her
moment of fame.
The convention, they knew, could turn sideways fast.
Fortunately for Hillary, for Bernie, and for the Democratic Party, Mook and
Weaver had a contingency plan. About a week before the convention, they had put
together a joint command operation behind the arena’s main stage. The boiler room,
a big open space filled with long tables, folding chairs, and telephones,
functioned as a nerve center from which the two camps could exert control over
their delegates during the four-day program. On one side sat an office for
Clinton’s senior staff and on the other a matching space for Bernie’s top
advisers. The phones, staffed by a mix of Hillary and Bernie aides, connected
directly to phones on the convention floor designated for each state’s
delegation. The big unions, which had been divided in the primaries but would
support the Democratic nominee, had their own whip operation humming nearby.
The boiler room proved a physical nexus for the Bernie and
Hillary brain trusts, but an electronic connection kept them in sync throughout
the convention hall. The two teams created a text messaging distribution list
that allowed for constant communication about potential problems during the
four-day convention. When a Bernie supporter raised an anti-Clinton sign, a
whip team member in the convention hall could relay the message quickly to the
boiler room.
Throughout [Clinton’s] speech, pockets of die-hard Bernie
backers screamed slogans at the stage. Each time, the joint Clinton-Sanders
whip team jumped into action, and chants of ‘U-S-A’ drowned out the dissidents.
Recalcitrant Bernie supporters who left the hall to get a soda or go to the
bathroom found that their seats had been occupied by pro-Clinton forces when
they returned. Schwerin, Rooney, and Sullivan had tailored the speech with the
aim of including a lot of applause lines, fearful that any lulls would
encourage outbursts from the pro-Bernie delegates. They had reassured Hillary
that there would be plenty of cheering to cover up any dissent. It turned out
to be a prescient concern. The interruptions were more disruptive in the hall
than they seemed at home, and several of Hillary’s longtime advisers said that
the cadence of her delivery was thrown off.
Ultimately, Clinton’s nomination was secured: “Mook was most
keenly aware of the optical illusion the two camps had pulled off, as he
revealed to friends in a story he would tell later. During the convention, a
woman approached him and said that the American flags in the arena were
beautiful. That was to hide the crazy people shouting things, he thought. But
it looked great. Similarly, the campaign looked a lot better in front of the
curtain than behind it.”
These passages convey not only the deeply anti-democratic
character of the Democratic Party, but also the degree to which the policy
decisions of the ruling class are influenced by their profound fear that social
opposition will break free from the confines of the Democratic Party and trade
unions.
In this framework, Sanders’s conscious role in shoring up
support for the Democratic Party exposes the right-wing character of the
American pseudo-left, which supported Sanders and thereby provided a left cover
for Sanders’s efforts to block an independent movement of the working class
from developing outside the control of the two main capitalist parties.
Throughout 2016, groups like the International Socialist
Organization and Socialist Alternative credited Sanders as responsible for
creating a left-wing challenge to what they call the “establishment” wing of
the Democratic Party.
In May 2015, these groups were joined
by other pseudo-left organizations at the Left-Elect Conference
in Chicago. At the time, Socialist Alternative published a letter distributed
to conference attendees and signed by Sanders himself.
“Dear Friends in Chicago,” the letter began, reading, in
part: “I strongly believe your efforts in Chicago this weekend and back home
are still very much complementary to the national electoral campaign that I
just announced this week. And I hope that this spirit of cooperation reflected
in your meeting agenda will extend to our mutual ability to work together, now and
in the future.”
This letter implicates the pseudo-left as co-conspirators in
Sanders’ efforts to provide the Democratic Party with a phony “left” veneer. It
was this thread of a common “spirit of cooperation” that linked them through
the Sanders campaign to the Democratic Party’s efforts to secure electoral
victory in 2016.
The general election
The sections of Shattered that
relate to the general election portray a campaign blinded by its own arrogance
that ignored repeated warnings of impending crisis. From the structure of the
book, which devotes far more attention to the primary than to the general
election, it is evident that the authors shared the conviction of the Clinton
camp that the contest with Sanders had been the “real” election—like the Obama-Clinton
primary struggle in 2008—and that the general election campaign against a
reactionary and unpopular Republican billionaire was merely an afterthought.
Clinton’s campaign felt that Sanders had wounded her
campaign by portraying her as “conspiring with Wall Street types to rig the
system against the little guy.” Meanwhile, Clinton set out to raise
extraordinary amounts of money from the financial aristocracy to fund a general
election campaign based largely on television advertising.
Hillary mingled with old friends in Sag Harbor under a tent
on the night of August 30: Calvin Klein, Harvey Weinstein, Jimmy Buffett, Jon
Bon Jovi, and Sir Paul McCartney. Buffett and his wife, Jane, were the hosts of
this extravaganza, which capped a multiday fund-raising blitz through the
Hamptons. For a minimum of $100,000, VIPs were treated to dinner, ‘premium
seating,’ and the option to dance the night away with Hillary, Bill, and a few
of their A-list pals. Hillary put on a brave face, reveled with her donors, and
even joined in singing ‘Hey Jude.’
While she was singing for the oligarchy’s
money, Clinton relied on Sanders for public
legitimacy: “To court the younger set, Hillary
turned to an old rival who had inflicted great
damage on her campaign: Bernie Sanders.”
money, Clinton relied on Sanders for public
legitimacy: “To court the younger set, Hillary
turned to an old rival who had inflicted great
damage on her campaign: Bernie Sanders.”
Sanders “was happy to keep his promise to do whatever he
could to help Hillary,” the authors write. When Sanders recorded a video urging
his supporters to vote for Clinton, Clinton’s campaign demanded that Sanders
remove a graph from the video which depicted the minimum wage rising to $15 an
hour. Clinton’s team demanded the graph “should only go up to $12 an hour, not
$15 an hour. … Bernie’s team executed.”
She also oriented toward winning support among the
Republican establishment while she continued her identity-based strategy from
the Democratic primaries. As for working class voters, and particularly white
workers, Clinton’s campaign “was giving up on persuading voters who weren’t
inclined to support Hillary because it was less efficient to go after them.” In
other words, they spent their money elsewhere.
The other element of Clinton’s general election strategy
relied on whipping-up anti-Russian sentiment to paint Trump as an ally of
Russian President Vladimir Putin. This was aimed above all at laying the basis
for a planned foreign policy shift targeting Russia. On October 7, when the US
military-intelligence apparatus announced—without providing any proof—that the
Russian government was responsible for hacking Democratic Party servers, the
Clinton campaign was prepared. In the chapter titled “Red October,” Allen and
Parnes write:
Putin might not be a Communist anymore, but he was a Russian
autocrat who came to power after a distinguished career in the KGB. This was
the kind of spy-thriller shit that would surely break through in the press. If
the public saw Trump putting Russian interests above American sovereignty,
Hillary’s aides thought, the story had the potential to break his back. After
all, in the Red Scare days, Republicans had portrayed liberal Democrats as
un-American in unflinching terms.
Several key Clinton aides “jumped on a conference call” to
respond by attacking Trump for making “apologies for the Russians.”
This McCarthyite formula was to be the basis of the
Democratic Party’s opposition to Trump, both before and after the election.
Shattered also explains Clinton’s hostility
to then-FBI Director James Comey’s decision to announce the FBI was reopening
its investigation into Clinton’s e-mails. Her campaign was deeply frustrated
with the fact that the Russia “narrative” was sidetracked by the October
release by Wikileaks of Clinton’s Wall Street speeches, plus internal
communications detailing broader Clinton corruption.
When election results came in, giving Trump narrow wins in
the industrial states of Wisconsin, Michigan and Pennsylvania, despite losing
by a wide margin in the popular vote, both the Democrats and Republicans were
shocked. The Republican Party had withheld publishing favorable internal
polling data because they simply didn’t believe data showing Trump could win.
The concession speech and anti-Russian hysteria
Shattered includes details as to how the
White House and Clinton campaign conceded the election, despite a widespread
desire on the part of her closest aides to challenge the results. The
conversations that took place between Obama and Clinton on election night
convey the fragility of the ruling apparatus. The ruling class was fearful that
any sign of opposition from Clinton to Trump’s victory would have provoked mass
protests that could have spiraled out of control.
Shattered reveals that on election night,
many Clinton aides were prepared to launch a legal fight to challenge the
legitimacy of the outcome. The results showed that the race was very close in
several states, and the campaign wanted to wait another day to see whether key
races tightened and whether the margin of Clinton’s popular vote advantage
would widen.
In stepped Barack Obama, with all the power of the military
and intelligence agencies behind him. First, an Obama aide called Clinton
campaign manager Mook: “We can’t drag this out. The president doesn’t think
it’s wise.”
When Mook passed Obama’s message on to Clinton, she said she
understood, but added, “I’m not ready to go give this speech.”
Then, Obama called her personally. “The White House had been
worried that Hillary might leave it all up in the air,” Allen and Parnes write.
Obama told Clinton in no uncertain terms: “You need to concede.”
Many of Clinton’s aides were urging her to fight the
election result, but Obama pressed her further to concede. In a fluke of
tied-up phone lines, the Clinton campaign could not reach the Trump campaign to
formally concede. In these confused minutes, Clinton’s top supporters begged
her to fight the results.
But, Allen and Parnes explain, “Obama was determined to make
sure his friend understood that the election was over. It’s done, he said.
Realize that. Deal with it with dignity and move on. After Trump had questioned
the legitimacy of the election, the last thing Obama wanted was for Hillary to
reinforce that message. As president, it was his job to safeguard the integrity
of the political process. … He didn’t see any point in prolonging the
inevitable. It wasn’t a question of when she would give a concession speech but
rather of making sure that she didn’t try to turn the election into a recount
mess. Turning around and playing Trump’s game of questioning the institutions
of American democracy wouldn’t be good for the country, he said. With his
message now delivered to Hillary, Mook, and Podesta, the president hung up.”
Clinton conceded, but the vote in the key industrial states
continued to tighten, and Clinton began to rack up an overwhelming margin in
the popular vote. One aide told Allen and Parnes: “Had anybody known that
night, no one would have conceded.”
She toned down her concession speech, eliminating statements
of opposition to Trump. Clinton said these remarks were “tone-deaf,” “too
charged,” and “too political.” She was concerned “she could unintentionally
incite supporters who despised Trump.”
These are striking admissions. The ruling class is deeply
conscious that it lacks legitimacy in the eyes of the broad masses of the
population.
Clinton’s response to the election further demonstrates how
the political establishment sought to divert anti-Trump sentiment in an
anti-Russian direction, aimed at advancing the interests of US imperialism.
Just hours after Clinton conceded, her campaign quickly spun a narrative aimed
at blaming the Russian government, launching unsupported claims that Russia
leaked copies of Clinton’s corrupt Wall Street speeches to Wikileaks.
“Hillary kept pointing her finger at [FBI Director James]
Comey and Russia,” Allen and Parnes note. They cite a close Clinton aide: “She
wants to make sure all these narratives get spun the right way.”
The campaign conceived a strategy for spreading the
anti-Russia narrative “within twenty-four hours of her concession speech. Mook
and Podesta assembled her communications team at the Brooklyn headquarters to
engineer the case that the election wasn’t entirely on the up-and-up. For a
couple of hours, with Shake Shack containers littering the room, they went over
the script they would pitch to the press and the public. Already, Russian
hacking was the centerpiece of the argument.” In the days that followed, “her
team coalesced around the idea that Russian hacking was the major unreported
story of the campaign, overshadowed by the contents of stolen e-mails and
Hillary’s own private server imbroglio.”
The anti-Russia narrative did not emerge out of Clinton’s
head simply as a defensive cover for her own electoral catastrophe. Working
with her allies from the State Department and the military-intelligence
apparatus, a powerful section of the American ruling class elevated Russia’s
alleged role as a mechanism to tamper social opposition, taint broad anti-Trump
sentiment with the poison of American nationalism, and advance the anti-Russian
agenda of US imperialism.
This narrative has been become the Democratic Party’s sole
method for opposing Trump in his first months of office. Rather than any appeal
to the mounting opposition to Trump’s right-wing rampage against democratic
rights, social programs, environmental programs and immigrants, or his
militaristic posturing, the Democrats have appealed to sections of the
military-intelligence apparatus and the media wedded to the Obama
administration’s policy of encircling Russia.
CAMPAIGN
TO DESTROY AMERICA and take a THIRD TERM FOR LIFE….
Barack
Obama’s 8 year sabotage of Homeland Security: His Crony Banksters, La Raza Drug
Cartels and MS-13 are right behind his sabotage of U.S. borders!
“Mexican drug cartels
are the “other” terrorist threat to America. Militant
Islamists have the
goal of destroying the United States. Mexican
drug cartels are now
accomplishing that mission – from within, every day, in virtually every community
across this country.” JUDICIAL WATCH
NO PRESIDENT IN HISTORY HAS SUCKED
IN MORE BRIBES FROM CRIMINAL BANKSTERS THAN BARACK OBAMA!
The American oligarchy, steeped in
criminality and parasitism, can produce only a government of war, social
reaction and repression. In its blind avarice, it is creating the conditions
for unprecedented social upheavals. It is hurtling toward its own revolutionary
demise at the hands of the working class.
THE FINAL DAYS OF HILLARY CLINTON
BEFORE SENTENCING
http://mexicanoccupation.blogspot.com/2016/10/hillary-clinton-ranked-most-corrupt.html
There’s the Clintons’ pay-to-play scheme, decorously called the
Clinton Foundation. It’s foundational to the Clintons and their cronies getting
rich. If you wanted time with Secretary of State Hillary, it didn’t hurt to
drop some rubles in
Clinton Foundation coffers. Quite a few rubles,
actually.
HILLARY BEGS OBAMA FOR PARDON
FOLLOWING THE CRIMES OF BILL AND HILLARY CLINTON BECOMES AMERICA’S ROAD
TO REVOLUTION
http://mexicanoccupation.blogspot.com/2016/10/bill-and-hillary-clintons-global.html
THE DEMISE AND ULTIMATE DESTRUCTION of HILLARY CLINTON
"Hillary Clinton is a known
liar, a criminal of monstrous proportions; others have gone to prison for
crimes she has committed over and over: lying to Congress, lying to the FBI,
violating national security laws by which she was bound as Secretary of State,
etc. It's a long list."
Clinton, the candidate favored by most of Wall Street and the corporate
elite and large sections of the Republican Party establishment, is seeking to
assemble something akin, within the framework of the US political setup, to a
grand coalition between the Democratic Party and the Republican leadership.
http://mexicanoccupation.blogspot.com/2016/10/clinton-preparing-bipartisan-government.html
Transcripts released by WikiLeaks of Clinton speeches to Wall Street
bankers, for which she received six-figure paychecks, show her praising the
recommendations of the 2010 Simpson-Bowles deficit-reduction commission, which
called for sweeping cuts to Social Security, Medicare and Medicaid; the
elimination of 200,000 federal jobs; a tax on employees’ health benefits; and
huge cuts in income taxes for the wealthy and corporate taxes.
Wikileaks exposes Obama’s bankster-infested
administration!
THE FINAL DAYS OF HILLARY CLINTON
BEFORE SENTENCING
http://mexicanoccupation.blogspot.com/2016/10/hillary-clinton-ranked-most-corrupt.html
There’s the Clintons’ pay-to-play scheme, decorously called the
Clinton Foundation. It’s foundational to the Clintons and their cronies getting
rich. If you wanted time with Secretary of State Hillary, it didn’t hurt to
drop some rubles in
Clinton Foundation coffers. Quite a few rubles,
actually.
HILLARY BEGS OBAMA FOR PARDON
http://hillaryclinton-whitecollarcriminal.blogspot.com/2016/05/hillary-flees-country-with-clinton.html
FOLLOWING THE CRIMES OF BILL AND HILLARY CLINTON BECOMES AMERICA’S ROAD
TO REVOLUTION
http://mexicanoccupation.blogspot.com/2016/10/bill-and-hillary-clintons-global.html
Transcripts released by
WikiLeaks of Clinton speeches to Wall Street bankers, for which she
received six-figure paychecks, show her praising the
recommendations of the 2010 Simpson-Bowles deficit-reduction
commission, which called for sweeping cuts to Social Security,
Medicare and Medicaid; the elimination of 200,000 federal jobs; a
tax on employees’
THE DEMISE AND ULTIMATE DESTRUCTION of HILLARY CLINTON
"Hillary Clinton is a known
liar, a criminal of monstrous proportions; others have gone to prison for
crimes she has committed over and over: lying to Congress, lying to the FBI,
violating national security laws by which she was bound as Secretary of State,
etc. It's a long list."
Clinton, the candidate favored by most of Wall Street and the corporate
elite and large sections of the Republican Party establishment, is seeking to
assemble something akin, within the framework of the US political setup, to a
grand coalition between the Democratic Party and the Republican leadership.
http://mexicanoccupation.blogspot.com/2016/10/clinton-preparing-bipartisan-government.html
Transcripts released by WikiLeaks of Clinton speeches to Wall Street
bankers, for which she received six-figure paychecks, show her praising the
recommendations of the 2010 Simpson-Bowles deficit-reduction commission, which
called for sweeping cuts to Social Security, Medicare and Medicaid; the
elimination of 200,000 federal jobs; a tax on employees’ health benefits; and
huge cuts in income taxes for the wealthy and corporate taxes.
“But what the Clintons do is
criminal because they do it wholly at the expense of the American people. And
they feel thoroughly entitled to do it: gain power, use it to enrich themselves
and their friends. They are amoral, immoral, and venal. Hillary has no core
beliefs beyond power and money. That should be clear to every person on the
planet by now.”
Wikileaks exposes Obama’s bankster-infested
administration!
BARACK OBAMA …… the banksters’ RENT BOY!
“Citigroup’s recommendations came just
three days after then-President George W. Bush signed into law the
Troubled Asset Relief Program, which allocated $700 billion
in taxpayer money to rescue the largest Wall Street banks. The single
biggest beneficiary was Citigroup, which was given $45 billion in cash
in the form of a government stock purchase, plus a $306 billion
government guarantee to back up its worthless mortgage-related assets.”
MUCH MORE HERE:
“As president, Obama not
only funneled trillions of dollars to the banks, he saw to it that not a
single leading Wall Street executive faced prosecution for the orgy of speculation and swindling
that led to the financial collapse and Great Recession, and
he personally intervened to block legislation capping executive pay at bailed-out
firms.”
“So
when Clinton was hobnobbing with Goldman Sachs CEO Blankfein in 2013,
while investigations of wrongdoing by Goldman and the other
Wall Street banks were still ongoing, she was consorting with a man
who belonged in prison.”
CRONY
BANKSTER LOOTING OF AMERICA
THEIR GOLDEN AGE OF PLUNDER IS NOT OVER!
NO PRESIDENT IN HISTORY SUCKED IN MORE BRIBES FROM BANKSTERS
NOR INFESTED HIS ADMIN WITH BANKSTER CRONIES MORE THAN OBAMA!
*
And
while the Obama administration worked systematically to bail out the banks and
make the financial oligarchy richer than ever, shielding the architects of the
Great Recession from criminal prosecution, it did impose fines for some of the
banks’ grossest swindles, including the sale of worthless subprime
mortgage-backed securities, the rigging of key global interest rates such as
the London Interbank Offered Rate (Libor), drug money laundering, illegal home
foreclosures and other illicit activities.
BARACK OBAMA , HIS CRIMINAL
BANKSTERS AND THE LA RAZA
MEXICAN DRUG CARTELS….
There’s more than one way to
destroy America’s white middle class!
HSBC laundered hundreds of
millions and perhaps billions of dollars for drug cartels responsible
for the deaths of tens of thousands of people over the past
two decades. The bank transferred at least $881 million of known drug
trafficking proceeds, including money from the Sinaloa Cartel in
Mexico, which is known for
dismembering its victims and publicly displaying their body parts.
Why did Hillary Clinton and the Democratic Party lose the 2016
election?
3 May 2017
In a public
appearance Tuesday with CNN’s Christiane Amanpour, 2016 Democratic presidential
candidate Hillary Clinton attributed her loss to Donald Trump last November to
two main factors: misogyny within the electorate and Russian interference. She
also placed emphasis on FBI Director James Comey’s October announcement that
the FBI was re-opening its investigation of her use of a private email account
while she was secretary of state.
Misogyny
“played a role,” she said, claiming that “it would have been a really big deal”
to elect the first woman president. She also blamed Russian President Vladimir
Putin, claiming he “clearly interfered in our election, and it was designed to
hurt me and help my opponent.” As proof of Russian meddling, Clinton pointed to
WikiLeaks’ release of emails from Clinton aide John Podesta, which included
transcripts of some of her paid speeches to Wall Street bankers.
Clinton’s claims are belied by the facts. In a
May 1 article titled “Why did Trump Win? New research by Democrats offers a
worrisome answer,” Washington
Post columnist
Greg Sargent cites poll data showing that Trump’s
election was the product of widespread economic
hardship in the working class and popular
opposition to the pro-corporate policies of the
Democratic Party.
Greg Sargent cites poll data showing that Trump’s
election was the product of widespread economic
hardship in the working class and popular
opposition to the pro-corporate policies of the
Democratic Party.
The poll,
commissioned by the Democratic Party-linked firm Priorities USA, was conducted
in the working class suburbs outside of Milwaukee, Wisconsin and Detroit,
Michigan, as well as in Tampa, Florida. All three of these traditional “swing
states” supported Barack Obama in 2008 and 2012, but swung for Trump in 2016.
The poll targeted two types of voters: those who voted for Obama in 2012 but
for Trump in 2016 (“Obama-Trump voters”) and those who voted for Obama in 2012
but did not vote in 2016 (“drop-off voters”).
The picture
that emerges from the poll is of a working class that is under tremendous
financial strain, is growing disillusioned with both parties, and is deeply
opposed to cuts in social programs such as health care.
“A key
commonality” of these voters is that “they are struggling economically,” the
pollsters conclude. Of Obama-Trump voters, 50 percent say their income is
falling behind the cost of living and 31 percent say their income is just equal
to rises in the cost of living. Conditions are even worse among drop-off
voters. Forty-three percent say their income is falling behind the cost of
living and 49 percent say their income is only staying even with the cost of
living—that is, 92 percent are either falling behind or barely staying afloat.
In a
confused and contradictory manner, Obama-Trump voters express the growth of
social opposition to the political establishment from the left. According to
these voters, the government’s most important priorities should be protecting
Social Security and Medicare (85 percent for both), creating good-paying jobs
(84 percent) and providing everyone with access to affordable health care (80
percent).
The poll shows these voters’ lowest priority is
building a wall between the US and Mexico. They are least concerned that Trump will “be too
close to Putin and won’t stand up to Putin.” They are substantially more
concerned that Trump will involve the US in foreign wars and will put the
interests of corporate executives ahead of working people.
Among
drop-off voters, 87 percent support raising taxes on corporations, 89 percent
support infrastructure spending, 79 percent support raising the minimum wage,
75 percent support raising taxes on the rich and 73 percent support paid family
leave for child care. Drop-off voters are by far most concerned with the
economy and access to health care. Only 6 percent say Russia is the most
important issue, with 5 percent citing immigration and 2 percent citing
terrorism/national security.
As their economic conditions deteriorate, those
polled view the policies of the Democratic Party as favoring the wealthy. The Washington Post’s Sargent notes, “One finding from the
polling stands out: A shockingly large percentage of these Obama-Trump voters
said Democrats’ economic policies will favor the wealthy—twice the percentage
that said the same about Trump. I was also permitted to view video of some
focus group activity, which showed Obama-Trump voters offering sharp criticism
of Democrats on the economy.”
Sargent
explained that when focus group respondents were asked what the Democratic
Party stands for, they responded: “the one percent” and “the status quo.” Among
those who voted for Obama in 2012 but didn’t vote in 2016, the most common
reasons given for abstaining include: “It makes no difference,” “I did not like
either candidate,” “I voted for Bernie Sanders in the primary; I couldn’t
support Clinton for the general election,” and “I’m tired of voting for the
lesser of two evils.”
These poll results confirm what the World Socialist Web Site stressed in its initial analysis of
the US election results: Clinton’s loss was the product of mass abstention by
workers—and particularly African American workers—in key industrial cities such
as Cleveland, Detroit and Milwaukee, plus swings by all racial groups toward
the Republican candidate in 2016 compared with 2012. Clinton’s claim that she
lost the election due to misogyny is refuted by the fact that exit polls show
the Democratic Party lost the votes of over a million working class women from
2012 to 2016.
The American
working class does not hate Hillary Clinton because of her gender, it hates her
because she embodies, both personally and politically, everything rotten about
American capitalism. More specifically, the dislike of Clinton expresses the
growing perception that the Democratic Party is the most naked representative
of the banks and corporations.
For the
first half of the 20th century, the Democratic Party based its national
presence on an alliance of sections of better-off professionals with Tammany
Hall city machines in the North, segregationists across the former slave states
in the South, and the trade union bureaucracies, first the American Federation
of Labor and later including the Congress of Industrial Organizations. The Stalinist
Communist Party played a critical role in bringing the mass strike movement of
the 1930s and the industrial unions that arose out of it under the control of
the Democratic Party. Even into the 1960s, the Democrats’ domestic program was
based on a series of mild social reforms—a partial cooptation of the platforms
of the pre-Depression populist and progressive movements.
A key
turning point came in the late 1960s, when the contradictions embedded in the
party’s anti-communist and pro-capitalist foundations burst into the open as
President Lyndon Johnson drained resources intended for Great Society social
programs to fund the war in Vietnam.
Deeply
discredited by the disastrous impact of the war and the administration’s
crackdown on anti-war demonstrations and inner-city riots, the Democratic Party
began to reorient itself toward a wealthy section of African-American and other
racial minorities who benefited from the Democratic Party-backed civil rights
legislation of the mid-1960s.
As the chasm
between rich and poor widened in the subsequent decades, the Democrats began to
abandon even the pretense of appealing to working class voters on the basis of
a program of social reform. Increasingly tied to Wall Street and the
military-intelligence agencies and increasingly unpopular within the working
class, the Democratic Party sought to build a broader electoral base in the
privileged upper-middle class, where the politics of race, gender and sexual
preference dominate.
Clinton’s
presidential campaign represented the ugly culmination of this rightward
trajectory. Her campaign married the military-intelligence apparatus and
finance capital to the politics of racial and gender identity, while Clinton
consciously ignored the economic struggles of the working class and opposed the
demagogue Trump from the right on questions of war and state surveillance.
Figures like
Bernie Sanders and his pseudo-left supporters play a most pathetic role in
shoring up support for the Democratic Party. Speaking on his swing-state tour
with Democratic Party Chairman and Clinton-confidante Thomas Perez, Sanders
recently told a crowd that they had “come to the right place” to talk about
“political revolution,” and that “our job is to radically transform the
Democratic Party.”
What Sanders,
Clinton and the entire political establishment fear most is that the growing
opposition that found an initial and distorted reflection in the 2016 election
will develop in a consciously left-wing, socialist direction.
Eric London
THE MEXICAN INVASION: BY INVITATION OF THE DEMOCRAT PARTY
THE MAP OF
LA RAZA MEXICAN OCCUPATION of what was America
AZTLAN
FASCISM AT OUR DOOR
"The American Southwest seems to be slowly
returning
to the jurisdiction of Mexico without firing a single shot." --
- EXCELSIOR --- national newspaper of Mexico
to the jurisdiction of Mexico without firing a single shot." --
- EXCELSIOR --- national newspaper of Mexico
LOS ANGELES IS THE WESTERN GATEWAY FOR LA RAZA HEROIN!
MEXICAN HEROIN POURS OVER THE NARCOMEX-U.S. BORDER
http://mexicanoccupation.blogspot.com/2017/05/while-these-filthy-politicians-cant.html
Americans die young, poor and addicted while politicians
angle for more amnesty and wider open borders with the LA RAZA cartels.
IMAGES OF THE PROPOSED OBAMA PRESIDENTIAL LIBRARY
AND MASSIVE MUSLIM MINERET TO CALL MUSLIMS TO PRAYER
AND HATRED OF AMERICA.
The Obama Presidential Library Will Be Funded by
America's 9-11 Invading Saudis Who Ban
Christians and Jews From Their Dictatorship.
http://mexicanoccupation.blogspot.com/2017/05/the-obama-presidential-library-will-be.html
The Obama Presidential Monument to a Psychopath Will
Provide Call to Prayers in the Muslim Tradition With One Massive Minaret
THE SINS OF THE FATHERS: THEIR GLOBAL LOOTING of the
POOR
THE OPEN BORDERS PARTY of GEORGE SOROS, HILLARY
& BILLARY CLINTON, BARACK OBAMA and DONALD TRUMP
DONALD TRUMP, HIS PARASITIC FAMILY, HIS GOLDMAN SACHS
REGIME and GOD FATHER, GEORGE SOROS… .global looters of the
poor!
http://mexicanoccupation.blogspot.com/2017/05/the-jared-kushner-donald-trump-george.html
THE OBAMA DOCTRINE:
DESTROY AMERICA TO BUILD A MUSLIM-STYLE DICTATORSHIP WHERE LA RAZA MEXICANS
VOTE HIM PRESIDENT FOR LIFE
"He is intent on maximizing the damage he inflicted on
the country during the two terms of his faux presidency, having now
set up shop in Washington to pursue a post-presidency agenda advancing a
left-wing insurgency, civil unrest, racial
conflict and the destabilizing activities of a shadow."
conflict and the destabilizing activities of a shadow."
THE TRUMP AMNESTY… BUILT ON THE OBAMA AMNESTY and
endorsed by NARCOMEX
Open the floodgates of our welfare
state to the uneducated, impoverished, and unskilled masses of the world and in
a generation or three America, as we know it, will be gone.
Those most impacted are middle
class and lower middle class. It is they whose jobs are taken, whose raises are
postponed, whose schools are filled with non-English speaking children that
absorb precious resources for remedial English, whose public parks are trashed
and whose emergency rooms serve as the local clinic for the illegal
underground.
BARACK OBAMA:
BUILDING HIS RETURN TO POWER PARTY WITH
ILLEGALS!
FUNDER AND LEADER OF THE MEXICAN FASCIST
PARTY of LA RAZA “The Race”
http://mexicanoccupation.blogspot.com/2016/10/the-racist-mexican-fascist-party-of-la.html
During Obama’s 8 year bankster
regime, he openly operated and funded the Mexican fascist racist party of LA
RAZA “The Race” from the White House under La Raza VP Cecilia Munoz…. Google
Obama and LA RAZA!
CALIFORNIA UNDER MEXCIAN OCCUPATION
California: The sick man of the United States…. A
STATE UNDER MEX OCCUPATION!
PUS-SPEWING XAVIER BECERRA…. Is what happens when illegals
vote LA RAZA FASCISM.
“As one attorney general, Kamala
Harris, steps down to replace Barbara Boxer, another attorney general is
secreted out of the glands of selfsame power in the form of pus-spewing Xavier
Becerra.”
It
didn’t stop Becerra, a prominent Latino rights advocate who has served in
Congress since 1993, from pushing for the dealer’s release at the request of
his father,
Horacio. The elder Vignali, a rich Los Angeles businessman, contributed
thousands of dollars to Becerra’s various campaigns and a favor was in
order.
CALIFORNIA UNDER LA RAZA SIEGE:
Mexico’s looting and ethnic cleansing of a once American state.
*
TRUMPERNOMICS: IMPLEMENTING
OBAMA-CLINTONIMCS
“CRIMINAL BANKSTERS WILL CONTINUE TO RULE
AMERICA!” Twitter Trumper
OBAMA-CLINTON-TRUMPERnomics: The
Massive Transfer of Wealth to the Super Rich Ratcheted up!
*
The American oligarchy, steeped in
criminality and parasitism, can produce only a government of war, social
reaction and repression. In its blind avarice, it is creating the conditions
for unprecedented social upheavals. It is hurtling toward its own revolutionary
demise at the hands of the working class.
*
BUT WE KNOW WHERE THEY LIVE!
“The massive transfer
of wealth will not go to investment, but to acquiring bigger
diamonds; more
luxurious mansions, yachts and private jets; new private
islands; more security
guards and better-protected gated communities to
segregate the
financial nobility from the masses whom they despise
and fear.”
“Our entire crony capitalist system, Democrat and Republican alike,
has become a
kleptocracy approaching par with third-world hell-holes.
This is the way a
great country is raided by its elite.” ---- Karen
McQuillan AMERICAN
THINKER.com
BARACK OBAMA PLANS A THIRD TERM: HIS CRONY BANKSTERS, LA RAZA, MUSLIMS
AND THOSE MUSLIM DICTATORSHIPS HE FUNDED ARE BEHIND HIM…. Along with George
Soros!
THE OBAMA COUP TO BE DICTATOR:
THE ARMY OF ILLEGALS TO BRING
AMERICA DOWN AND FORM THE OBAMA MUSLIM-STYLE DICTATORSHIP THAT WILL BE OPEN
BORDERS AND PRO LA RAZA FASCIST SUPREMACY.
Daniel Greenfield, the award-winning Shillman
Journalism Fellow at the Freedom Center, believes (OBAMA'S POLITICAL PARTY)
“OFA will be far more dangerous in the wild than the Clinton Foundation ever
was.”
“Barack
Obama and his henchmen would not have been emboldened in their ostensible
machinations to undermine an election and then a presidency if it were
not for the fecklessness of the Republican Party and the blind eye as
well as the
tacit support of the mainstream media.”
BARACK OBAMA PLANS A THIRD TERM: HIS CRONY BANKSTERS, LA RAZA, MUSLIMS
AND THOSE MUSLIM DICTATORSHIPS HE FUNDED ARE BEHIND HIM…. Along with George
Soros!
THE OBAMA COUP TO BE DICTATOR:
THE ARMY OF ILLEGALS TO BRING
AMERICA DOWN AND FORM THE OBAMA MUSLIM-STYLE DICTATORSHIP THAT WILL BE OPEN
BORDERS AND PRO LA RAZA FASCIST SUPREMACY.
Daniel Greenfield, the award-winning Shillman
Journalism Fellow at the Freedom Center, believes (OBAMA'S POLITICAL PARTY)
“OFA will be far more dangerous in the wild than the Clinton Foundation ever
was.”
“Barack
Obama and his henchmen would not have been emboldened in their ostensible
machinations to undermine an election and then a presidency if it were
not for the fecklessness of the Republican Party and the blind eye as
well as the
tacit support of the mainstream media.”
THE LEGACY OF
BARACK OBAMA:
Final Death of the American White Middle Class
Under the Obama administration, more Americans have found themselves consigned to economic ghettos, living in neighborhoods where more than 40 percent subsist below the poverty level.
*
Millions more now live in “high poverty” districts
of 20-40 percent poverty, according to recently released report by the
Brookings Institution.
THE OBAMA BOOK DEAL: Sixty-five million dollars—or even $267.5
million—is a small price to pay for the contribution the former president made
to enriching the already fabulously rich, defending the American ruling elite’s
geopolitical interests around the world and continuing the assault on the
wages, benefits and living standards of the working class.
Plenty of money for ILLEGALS……AMERICA’S
OPEN BORDERS
HOMELESS ELDERLY in AMERICA UNDER
MEX OCCUPATION
A Nation dies young, poor, addicted
and homeless…. It’s the American dream as the rich get super rich!
According to the National Alliance to End Homelessness, the number
of elderly persons who are homeless in the US will have doubled by 2050.
America’s Super-rich Live 15 Years Longer!
………….. America’s Bludgeoned Middle-Class Dies Young, Addicted and Poor!
WE ARE MEXICO'S WELFARE SYSTEM
.... A Glimpse...
$640,000 and breeding anchor babies like bunnies
MURDER, RAPE, LOOT and VOTE DEM FOR MORE!
EACH ILLEGAL WILL COST THE AMERICAN PEOPLE $640,000
and then they go breed anchor babies for more!
http://mexicanoccupation.blogspot.com/2016/09/immigrants-cost-legals-640000-how.html
Time and experience have taught Americans that we either agree with the Barack Obama or become the object of his wrath. The former president is so physically uncomfortable with disapproval that he becomes myopically fixated and seems obsessed w...
Brandenburg Barack Reprimands Donald Trump
Time and experience have taught Americans that we either agree with the Barack Obama or become the object of his wrath. The former president is so physically uncomfortable with disapproval that he becomes myopically fixated and seems obsessed w...
May 27, 2017
Brandenburg Barack Reprimands Donald Trump
Time and experience have taught Americans that we either agree with the Barack Obama or become the object of his wrath. The former president is so physically uncomfortable with disapproval that he becomes myopically fixated and seems obsessed with the mission of convincing his critics otherwise.
There’s no doubt that Obama perceives the 2016 election as a complete rejection of everything he stands for. That’s why; of late, the ex-president seems compelled to correct those he perceives as having rejected what it is he believes.
So, when not kite-surfing in Tahiti, super yachting and relaxing in Teti'aroa, or gorging on Torta di Ceci in Tuscany, Obama is about the business of chastising Americans his eight years of continual haranguing did nothing to change and embarrassing the president those voters elected.
Take for instance Trump’s injunction concerning refugees and immigrants from seven majority-Muslim countries.
Unable to restrain the urge to express his opinion on the subject, the former POTUS waited just one week before having his spokesperson congratulate Americans for protesting the ban. That’s right, less than six months out of office and by inspiring thugs to oppose Trump with street violence; Obama has slipped back into the role of community organizer.
Then, as a representative of the government knowing better than parents, Obama, who was busy counting the $3.2 million stipend he pocketed in Milan, sent a “riled up” Michelle to the 2017 Healthier Future Summit, to rebuke Donald Trump for daring to implement a policy.
Obama’s proxy was so irate, she accused the current president of not caring about the same children both she and her husband would have aborted so as to never require a school lunch. In fact, Michelle equated minor nutritional adjustments to the menu with Trump feeding children “crap!”
More recently, Obama again exhibited his incapacity to control the urge to outmaneuver anyone disagreeing with, or getting more attention than him.
Rather than canceling the speech he supposedly committed to last year, and in hopes of seizing attention from Trump during his first international visit, Obama agreed to appear beside the chancellor who is orchestrating the Muslim conquest of Germany.
In the run-up to that speech, in hopes of offsetting Trump’s exposure, “Dear Barack” photo bombed the current president. To ensure everyone was aware he was in Europe, prior to meeting up with the women he spied on, Obama thrilled the European press by strutting around Tuscany in sunglasses, accompanied by a wife dressed in a shoulder-baring laced-up number that looked like a ripped sheet.
Then, just days after 22 youthful-corpses were lined up in a Manchester morgue, felled by a Libyan refugee/terrorist-administered nail bomb, at an event commemorating the 500th anniversary of the Reformation, Obama exploited the event by discounting the value of finding a way to make it harder for terrorists to plant shrapnel in little girls.
Feeling compelled to add credence to absurdity, and to present a stark comparison an agenda he views as a personal affront, the ex-president garnered strength from the words of a liberal pop star who can’t co-exist with a husband, boyfriend, or Taylor Swift. Reacting to the Manchester massacre, singer and intellectual oracle Katy Perry pronounced that there should be “No barriers, no borders, we all just need to coexist.” Such foolhardy gibberish was all the affirmation Obama needed to reconfirm his commitment to a message that emboldens extremists.
Obama also doubled down on former State Department SPOX Marie Harf’s suggestion that rehabilitating ISIS requires jobs programs. Without mentioning the far-right populist president’s name, in the shadow of Brandenburg Gate, the rock star usurper took it upon himself to school a man he clearly perceives to be intellectually inferior to himself, saying:
One way we can do a better job is to create more opportunities for people in their home countries. If there are disruptions in these countries, if there is bad governance, if there is war or if there is poverty, in this new world that we live in we can’t isolate ourselves -- we can’t hide behind a wall.
In Germany, Obama promoted “new world”-globalism telling the crowd that, according to loftier thinking, “We can’t isolate ourselves -- we can’t hide behind a wall.”
The ex-president elaborated by adding “a child on the other side of the border is no less worthy of love and compassion than my own child. We can’t distinguish between them in terms of… worth and inherent dignity, and that they’re deserving of shelter and love and education and opportunity.”
That kind of liberal rationale comes from a well-practiced hypocrite.
If Obama doesn’t believe in walls, why then does he “isolate” himself behind the brick wall that surrounds his Washington, DC rental property?
Moreover, is Obama saying that the children on the other side of the wall outside his DC brick mansion are “less worthy of love and compassion” than Sasha and Malia? By blocking children out, is Barack distinguishing “between [children] in terms of their worth and inherent dignity, and [implying] that [only two are] deserving of shelter and love and education and opportunity?”
As for the children Obama cited in his speech, could some of those “deserving” cherubs be the adorable unaccompanied-minor MS-13 gang members his administration knowingly released onto American streets and who are currentlyhacking off heads on Long Island?
Either way, with all bloodshed in Britain, Barack was not about to waste an opportunity to adjust the attitude of his detractors, especially if doing so provided an excuse to elevate his philosophies above those of his successor.
And so, based on Obama’s comments, the reason the world’s greatest defender of failed liberal policy traveled all the way to Germany was not to commend Martin Luther, but as an excuse to crash Trump’s party, exalt his egotistical self, and to reaffirm among friends that his worldview is far superior to Donald Trump’s.
Jeannie hosts a blog at www.jeannie-ology.com
May 27, 2017
Some future commencement topics for Hillary Clinton
Hillary gave the commencement speech at Wellesley College where she said how important the truth is and that people shouldn't make up their own facts. The liberal media is wildly cheering that she is back. .
She will follow that up with several other topics like:
- How important it is for government officials to use only secure computers to send and receive classified documents in order to comply with the law.
- The need to keep all emails and other document records and to turn them over when you resign to comply with the law and so you can promptly comply with the law on FOIA requests.
- The importance of cooperating with inspectors general because government officials must comply with all laws, not just ones they like.
- Making sure your staff doesn't get paid by up to three organizations to prevent conflicts of interest.
- How to block Russia from getting control of U.S.-produced uranium especially if your family and related entities have been getting huge paychecks from the companies and countries involved.
- How to ensure the ambassadors and staff that you are responsible for are safe but if they should get killed, then the importance of putting political priorities first - even if that means scuppering the truth making up things. Can we hear her tell us how very important it is to tell the truth to the families of those who died instead of: "At this point, what difference does it make?"
- On the importance of fair elections, she should point out how important it is to have fair primaries. Can she say that it would never be fair to stack the primary tally with superdelegates before the primaries are held to give one handpicked candidate preference?
- She could tell a future graduating class how to make $100,000 on cattle futures from a $1,000 investment. She might tell them that technically you shouldn't be able to trade with only $1,000, but if you marry right, that someone that can trade political favors to ensure that it works. Cattle futures looks so much better than having to admit a kickback. It is obviously O.K. to do this if you believe you need more money.
- Hillary could describe how easy it is to get money for campaigns if you live in the White house. You can have breakfasts and rent out rooms for big money. The Lincoln Bedroom is the most valuable room. When you leave office you can take stuff with you. And describe yourself as 'dead broke.'
- Another speech could teach students how to prepare for a debate or any test. She would tell them that if they as smart as she is, and that if anyone ever slips them them the questions or answers prior to the test, they should turn them down because only cheaters and truly dishonest people would ever accept an unfair advantage like that.
- She could do a special speech to young ladies about women's' health care and reproductive rights saying how Planned Parenthood is very careful when they crush and crunch babies to save the valuable body parts.
- Another speech to women's groups would involve telling them how to have a happy home life to prevent their husbands from straying. She could tell them that if their husbands do stray with one-to-a hundred women, they should always treat the other women with respect. There should never be any attempt to call them liars or to destroy their lives. If a woman accuses your husband of rape, they are obviously telling the truth. Whatever you do, never set up a war room.
- Hillary likes to focus on women and children because it takes a village to raise a child. She would tell the audience how important it is to raise children who are grounded like Chelsea. Chelsea has said she was never interested in money as she got corporate board seats, a $600,000 network job despite no experience, $75,000 speeches, flew around in private jets and lived modestly in her $10 million apartment. We have always taught Chelsea to care as little about money as Bill and she herself did.
- She should go before environmental groups and tell them that when you are flying in private jets and living in mansions that you should always plant a tree or two to hold down your carbon footprint. If you are talking to fossil fuel companies, make sure you tell them how great it is that they were so instrumental in improving the quality and length of life throughout the world. If someone mistakenly slips a comment in saying you want to bankrupt coal companies make sure that you say that was a misinterpretation.
- She could have a speech where she focuses on businesses and jobs. She could repeat what she has previously said that it is not businesses that create jobs. We all know throughout America's history that it is government that creates jobs.
- As she is advocating free college these days, she could decry anyone who would dare accept $250,000 for a speech and who would demand special transportation and first-class lodging at one of these inflated-tuition universities. Those things are just unfair when people like her are trying to make college more affordable or free for all.
- Her final speech could again focus on honesty, always taking blame for what one does and always treating people with utmost respect. Always tell the truth and tell those around you to tell the truth. If you broke the law take your medicine because no one is above the law, especially those in power. She could tell people that it is deplorable to call people deplorable and that no one should ever blame others like making up a vast right wing conspiracy whenever there are things she doesn't want to explain.
As Hillary is giving these thoughtful speeches, the media will continue to cheer as they admire her honesty, candor and modesty. They could have another thrill running up their leg.
In her speech to to Wellesley Hillary also decried Trump's budget harshly by calling it cruel. She called it a mean spirited con. This certainly implies that Hillary has done a deep analysis of the budget in the same manner as all Democrat and media critics. I assume they have all gone through the budget line by line as many times as Obama did.
I believe Hillary can be asked one easy question; Is Trump's Medicaid budget for 2018 higher or lower than Obama's 2017 and by how much? My guess is she has no idea what the answer is. Maybe Donna Brazill could give the smartest woman in the world the question and answer in advance.
HILLARY & BILLARY: Their Looting of the Poor of
Haiti
“The couple parlayed lives supposedly spent in “public service”
into admission into the upper stratosphere of American wealth, with incomes in
the top 0.1 percent bracket. The source of this vast wealth was a political
machine that might well be dubbed “Clinton, Inc.” This consists essentially of
a seedy money-laundering operation to ensure big business support for the
Clintons’ political ambitions as well as their personal fortunes. The basic
components of the operation are lavishly paid speeches to Wall Street and
Fortune 500 audiences, corporate campaign contributions, and donations to the
ostensibly philanthropic Clinton Foundation.”
THE OPEN BORDERS PARTY of GEORGE SOROS, HILLARY
& BILLARY CLINTON, BARACK OBAMA and DONALD TRUMP
THE OBAMA DOCTRINE:
Under the Obama administration, more Americans have found themselves consigned to economic ghettos, living in neighborhoods where more than 40 percent subsist below the poverty level.
THE PHONY CLINTON FOUNDATION… FUNDED BY OBAMA’S CRONY BANKSTERS,
MUSLIM DICTATORS, CRIMINAL BILLIONAIRES….
AT THE SATANS' DOOR WAY......
THE SAVE CHELSEA CLINTON MOVEMENT
Chelsea lives in a $11 million dollar New York City condo her
parents bought with their bribes for speeches money.
The Clinton phony charity foundation has paid out less than $9
million out of the hundreds of millions they have sucked in from Obama’s crony
banksters, Muslim dictators whom Hillary served as Secretary of State and
criminal billionaires Billary has long known on a first name basis.
Let’s work together to save this nation from these three low-life
scumbag parasites!
CLINTON’S ENTIRE POLITICAL LIFE HAS BEEN A CESSPOOL OF
SELF-SERVING CORRUPTION!
HILLARY CLINTON: SERVANT TO (paying) DICTATORS
HER PUTIN CONNECTION
"Secondly, for eight years Russian businesses and
businessmen closely aligned with Putin pumped millions into the Clinton
Foundation slush fund, paid her husband a half-million dollars for a single
speech, and got in return a substantial portion of our uranium assets when, as
Secretary of State, Hillary okayed their purchase."
HILLARY
AND OBOMB’S DIRTY SAUDIS DICTATORS…. How much as she sucked in?
THE CLINTONS SERVE THEIR 9-11 INVADING SAUDIS PAYMASTERS!
DANCING WITH DICTATORS.... BOTH THE CLINTONS ARE EXPERT DANCERS
“Facilitating strategic technology transfer in
return for money is an old Clinton game. The Chinese bought their way to
access of considerable space technology when Bill Clinton was president.
Remember Charlie Trie, Loral, and the rest of the crew?”
HILLARY, BILLARY and the OBOMB: Were they America’s
biggest looters?
OBAMA-CLINTONOMICS:
You were wondering how many jobs went to illegals
and how well Obama’s crony banksters have done???
The sputtering economic recovering under President Obama,
the last to follow a major recession, has fallen way short of the average
recovery and ranks as the worst since the 1930s Great Depression, according to
a new report.
Had the recovery under Obama been the average of the 11
since the Depression, according to the report, family incomes would be $17,000
higher, six million fewer Americans would be in poverty, and there would be six
million more jobs.
*
THE OBAMA-CLINTON ECONOMIC MELTDOWN ----- HOME OWNERSHIP – ECONOMIC MELTDOWN
THE OBAMA DOCTRINE: ABET CRONY BANKSTERS SO THEY
CAN FINSISH OFF THE AMERICAN MIDDLE CLASS. KEEP BORDERS WIDE OPEN TO EASE
MILLIONS OF MEX FLAG WAVERS INTO OUR JOBS, WELFARE OFFICES AND VOTING BOOTHS,
AND EXPAND THE MEXICAN DRUG CARTELS’ MARKETS IN AMERICA’S OPEN BORDERS TO KILL
OFF AMERICA’S WHITE POPULATION TO BUILD A MUSLIM-STYLE DICTATORSHIP FOR ONE
BARACK OBAMA, THE “Hope & Change” HUCKSTER FROM CHICAGO.
"The decline in homeownership is one sign of the deep
social crisis in the United States. As rents and housing costs have
soared, spurred on by financial speculation that has enriched the
ruling elites, incomes and jobs for most Americans have shriveled."
SOARING POVERTY AND DRUG ADDICTION UNDER OBAMA
"These figures present a scathing indictment
of the social order that prevails in America, the world’s wealthiest country,
whose government proclaims itself to be the globe’s leading democracy. They are
just one manifestation of the human toll taken by the vast and all-pervasive
inequality and mass poverty
AND THEIR BRIBES JUST KEPT ROLLING……..
HILLARY & BILLARY AND RED CHINA!
“Facilitating strategic technology transfer in
return for money is an old Clinton game. The Chinese bought their way to
access of considerable space technology when Bill Clinton was president.
Remember Charlie Trie, Loral, and the rest of the crew?”
THE OPEN BORDERS PARTY of GEORGE SOROS, HILLARY
& BILLARY CLINTON, BARACK OBAMA and DONALD TRUMP
DESTROY AMERICA TO BUILD A MUSLIM-STYLE DICTATORSHIP WHERE LA RAZA MEXICANS
VOTE HIM PRESIDENT FOR LIFE
"He is intent on maximizing the damage he inflicted on
the country during the two terms of his faux presidency, having now
set up shop in Washington to pursue a post-presidency agenda advancing a
left-wing insurgency, civil unrest, racial conflict and the destabilizing activities of a shadow."
BARACK OBAMA PLANS A THIRD TERM: HIS CRONY BANKSTERS, LA RAZA, MUSLIMS
AND THOSE MUSLIM DICTATORSHIPS HE FUNDED ARE BEHIND HIM…. Along with George
Soros!
THE OBAMA COUP TO BE DICTATOR:
THE ARMY OF ILLEGALS TO BRING
AMERICA DOWN AND FORM THE OBAMA MUSLIM-STYLE DICTATORSHIP THAT WILL BE OPEN
BORDERS AND PRO LA RAZA FASCIST SUPREMACY.
Daniel Greenfield, the award-winning Shillman
Journalism Fellow at the Freedom Center, believes (OBAMA'S POLITICAL PARTY)
“OFA will be far more dangerous in the wild than the Clinton Foundation ever
was.”
“Barack
Obama and his henchmen would not have been emboldened in their ostensible
machinations to undermine an election and then a presidency if it were
not for the fecklessness of the Republican Party and the blind eye as
well as the
tacit support of the mainstream media.”
BARACK OBAMA PLANS A THIRD TERM: HIS CRONY BANKSTERS, LA RAZA, MUSLIMS
AND THOSE MUSLIM DICTATORSHIPS HE FUNDED ARE BEHIND HIM…. Along with George
Soros!
THE OBAMA COUP TO BE DICTATOR:
THE ARMY OF ILLEGALS TO BRING
AMERICA DOWN AND FORM THE OBAMA MUSLIM-STYLE DICTATORSHIP THAT WILL BE OPEN
BORDERS AND PRO LA RAZA FASCIST SUPREMACY.
Daniel Greenfield, the award-winning Shillman
Journalism Fellow at the Freedom Center, believes (OBAMA'S POLITICAL PARTY)
“OFA will be far more dangerous in the wild than the Clinton Foundation ever
was.”
“Barack
Obama and his henchmen would not have been emboldened in their ostensible
machinations to undermine an election and then a presidency if it were
not for the fecklessness of the Republican Party and the blind eye as
well as the
tacit support of the mainstream media.”
THE LEGACY OF
BARACK OBAMA:
Final Death of the American White Middle Class
Under the Obama administration, more Americans have found themselves consigned to economic ghettos, living in neighborhoods where more than 40 percent subsist below the poverty level.
*
Millions more now live in “high poverty” districts
of 20-40 percent poverty, according to recently released report by the
Brookings Institution.
THE OBAMA BOOK DEAL: Sixty-five million dollars—or even $267.5
million—is a small price to pay for the contribution the former president made
to enriching the already fabulously rich, defending the American ruling elite’s
geopolitical interests around the world and continuing the assault on the
wages, benefits and living standards of the working class.
Plenty of money for ILLEGALS……AMERICA’S
OPEN BORDERS
HOMELESS ELDERLY in AMERICA UNDER
MEX OCCUPATION
A Nation dies young, poor, addicted
and homeless…. It’s the American dream as the rich get super rich!
According to the National Alliance to End Homelessness, the number
of elderly persons who are homeless in the US will have doubled by 2050.
America’s Super-rich Live 15 Years Longer!
………….. America’s Bludgeoned Middle-Class Dies Young, Addicted and Poor!
http://mexicanoccupation.blogspot.com/2017/04/americas-super-rich-live-15-years.html
After Wellesley, yes, Hillary's still running...
Hillary Clinton waded back into the
celebrity college commencement speaker trough, undoubtedly with big speaking fees, giving her first public speech outlining
her tax-and-spend agenda at her old alma mater, Wellesley College.
Her operatives
also played down reports from it that she had long cough attacks during the
delivery, which may be signs of serious medical issues. They casually dismissed
it as allergies. Of such unnecessary protestations, "At this point, what
difference does it make?"
Which brings
us to the real point here: Hillary is running for president again.
BLOG: HILLARY & BILLARY - PROGRAMMED TO LOOT. THEY WILL DO IT ON THEIR DEATH BEDS!
One has to ask
what the motivation for this
might be, given that she is in poor health, in
her
mid-70s, has seen her pay-to-play
Foundation fundraising cash cow collapse,
and
undoubtedly is mentally exhausted from
the last run just six months ago.
American
Thinker editor
emeritus Richard Baehr has observed:
"I think she looks at rest of democratic
field and President Trump's approval numbers and is considering one more try
for president. What else can keep her relevant?"
He's right.
She sees her opportunity and she's going to take it. That would explain the
public speaking engagements (paid, of course) and the hard-to-believe denials
of chronic medical problems.
So what does
the field look like and who else is out there? Will Andrew Cuomo take her place
as the next Democratic Party favorite? He's making noises for it. Possible, but
not entirely a threat, given Clinton's vastly greater name recognition and
popularity among her supporters. Bernie Sanders? Maybe, but he's got a ceiling
on his support due to his socialist orientation. There's Chuckie Schumer, the
Castro brothers, Corey Booker from New Jersey, Massachusetts Democratic
governor Deval Patrick, maybe Democratic National Committee Chairman Tom Perez.
Yet none can hold a candle to her own standard as party standard bearer or
presidential candidate.
There's one
name that might be such a threat however: Elizabeth Warren, whose name
recognition is comparable to Hillary's own, and who also has a fanatic base of
followers.
She's also not
known to be on good terms with Hillary Clinton or the Clinton machine, despite
occasional limp endorsements. In fact, it's believed the two women hate each
other. Hillary can never seen Warren as a friend or coeval - she's an unwelcome
rival.
And if so,
there are plenty of reasons why, to look at the psychology of the matter.
Hillary
married her way to power and is highly reliant on her husband, the oozing-charm
natural politician Bill Clinton for political advice and direction. She knows
this. Elizabeth Warren, on the other hand, is entirely self-made. And Clinton
knows this, too. This one fact alone has to rankle her the most.
House flipper,
fake Indian, affirmative action fraudster, Elizabeth Warren bit and clawed her
way to the top in ways only someone from a hardscrabble lower middle class
background with immense ambition could do. Hillary
has always had her
'achievements' handed
to her by someone else. Yes, it has to
rankle.
Warren also
has a track record of sorts, making a name for herself with the establishment
of the Consumer Protection Financial Bureau, supposedly to use as a hammer
against corporate interests which are so part of her political platform. She's
a tenured Harvard professor, too, which has to rankle Clinton further, given
her own middle class roots. Hillary, by contrast, has no achievements to point
to, either as a Senator or as a former Secretary of State. In fact, her record
is one of continuous failure, not merely leftwing policy, but failed leftwing
policy. It has to rankle.
Warren is also
a fresher face and it might mean something that she's thinner and skinnier than
the chronically corpulent Clinton. Personal jealousy? I vote yes.
In light of
all those variables, is it any surprise Hillary might just be thinking of
running? She's not going to let the 'first woman president' title go to a hated
rival like Warren. No, with her Wellesley speech and other calculated
appearances, Clinton's going to continue pursuing the crown she thinks is
rightfully hers. Especially since she sees that Warren might get it.
Many making the accusations of xenophobia live in rarified societies and neighborhoods or in high-end and fashionable apartment buildings with security guards and doormen, immune from the consequences of Open Borders, loss of manual jobs, overseas nation-building, and the harmful effects arising from perfunctory background checks and superficial vetting.
THE
CLINTON-OBAMA PLAN TO DESTROY
DEMOCRACY IN AMERICA FOR GLOBALIST
BILLIONAIRES
INCLUDING THEIR PAYMASTER
GEORGE SOROS!
"When it comes to Islamic terror
or shariah imposition, Obama and
other globalists preach a type of defenselessness and impotence: something we
have to abide. For many liberals, virtue signaling, the epitome of vanity,
is more important than saving lives, even the lives of their countrymen."
Many making the accusations of xenophobia live in rarified societies and neighborhoods or in high-end and fashionable apartment buildings with security guards and doormen, immune from the consequences of Open Borders, loss of manual jobs, overseas nation-building, and the harmful effects arising from perfunctory background checks and superficial vetting.
No comments:
Post a Comment